## What changed
git-scottr/mike
A legal-practice fork focused on making conflict checks a deliberate, reviewable part of client and matter intake.
@git-scottr is shaping Mike around conflicts checking for legal work. The fork introduces a dedicated place to record potential conflicts involving clients, matters, parties, and affiliates, then search and assess them before a decision is made.
The direction is practical workflow support: capture the relationships that matter, keep a record of searches and decisions, and give staff a clear Conflicts interface rather than leaving the work scattered. It is early, but the first change is a focused vertical slice rather than a cosmetic detour.
What's in it
- Conflict records Record potential conflicts across clients, matters, parties, and affiliates.
- Conflict search Search conflict information by term when reviewing a new or existing matter.
- Review decisions Support a human review step for conflict checks and their outcomes.
- Audit trail Keep a record of conflict searches and review activity.
- Dedicated Conflicts workspace Bring conflict-checking work into its own interface.
Direction
workflowcompliancesearch
Activity
This fork adds a dedicated way for firms to search potential client and matter conflicts before taking work on.
This fork turns conflict screening into a dedicated review process, with sensitive records kept out of the wider workspace.
Threads of work (detailed view)
git-scottr brings conflicts checking into the intake desk
This fork adds a dedicated way for firms to search potential client and matter conflicts before taking work on.
git-scottr makes conflict checks a guarded human workflow
This fork turns conflict screening into a dedicated review process, with sensitive records kept out of the wider workspace.
Pull requests (detailed view)
✅ Merged (1)
by
git-scottr · opened 3d ago · merged 3d ago by git-scottr