abbyshekit/mike

A near-untouched Mike fork whose only visible work is a tight set of backend security fixes proposed by abbyshekit.

Effectively undiverged from upstream and quiet since spring 2026 - a couple of security fixes proposed, then no further movement.

View on GitHub →

This is a fork of Mike that sits right on top of upstream - there's nothing here you'd try out that differs from the original app itself. What abbyshekit has actually done shows up as focused backend hardening: a small, deliberate set of security and operational fixes aimed at the Express backend rather than any new legal-tech feature.

The work reads like a careful contributor's, not a product builder's. abbyshekit's changes close concrete exposures - an access check that was being skipped when creating a chat, sensitive user data being written to disk on every request, and a signing secret that fell back to an insecure default when none was configured. Each is surgical and self-contained, filed as PR-style fixes without touching schema, dependencies, or unrelated formatting.

Beyond the handle itself we don't have signal on who abbyshekit is, and there's no rebrand, niche, or deployment story to speak of yet. If you're curious, the interesting material is the security work - click through to GitHub to read it.

What's in it

Direction

security

Activity

Themed changes and pull requests touching this fork, newest first. Themed changes that haven't been turned into a public post yet still appear — they're real work even without a published writeup.

📝 abbyshekit goes leak-hunting in Mike's backend 0 commits securitycompliance draft
Three small, targeted security fixes, each closing a concrete way access or client data could slip out - though the pull request was closed minutes after it was filed, so none of it actually landed.

Threads of work (detailed view)

2 threads have been distilled into posts.

abbyshekit goes leak-hunting in Mike's backend

Three small, targeted security fixes, each closing a concrete way access or client data could slip out - though the pull request was closed minutes after it was filed, so none of it actually landed.

Pull requests (detailed view)

2 PRs touch this fork — inbound (filed against it) or outbound (filed from it). State icons match the editorial dashboard.

⛔ Closed without merge (2)