jrklaus8 splits Canadian tribunal work into two parallel tracks
A new routing layer sends procedural and substantive legal questions down separate analysis paths - and runs them at the same time.
jrklaus8's mike-Canada fork is building toward a system that handles tribunal matters the way a good lawyer does: procedure and substance as two distinct problems. When a file is flagged as a tribunal matter, the fork splits the analysis in two - one track works the procedural questions (the rules of bodies like Ontario's Landlord and Tenant Board or Human Rights Tribunal), another works the substantive law (case law under Canada's Vavilov standard of review) - then runs both side by side before combining the results.
For now it's scaffolding, not a finished product. The parallel analysis is still placeholder, and the login and document-handling pieces are early stubs that need real security work before anyone should trust them. But the core idea - routing procedural and substantive questions down separate paths - is cleaner than most attempts, and it's the part worth clicking through for.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?