jrklaus8 splits Canadian tribunal work into two parallel tracks

A new routing layer sends procedural and substantive legal questions down separate analysis paths - and runs them at the same time.

workflowinfrastructure

jrklaus8's mike-Canada fork is building toward a system that handles tribunal matters the way a good lawyer does: procedure and substance as two distinct problems. When a file is flagged as a tribunal matter, the fork splits the analysis in two - one track works the procedural questions (the rules of bodies like Ontario's Landlord and Tenant Board or Human Rights Tribunal), another works the substantive law (case law under Canada's Vavilov standard of review) - then runs both side by side before combining the results.

For now it's scaffolding, not a finished product. The parallel analysis is still placeholder, and the login and document-handling pieces are early stubs that need real security work before anyone should trust them. But the core idea - routing procedural and substantive questions down separate paths - is cleaner than most attempts, and it's the part worth clicking through for.

So what Anyone building AI tools for administrative or tribunal practice should look at how this fork separates procedural from substantive reasoning.

View this fork on GitHub →

Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?

Commits in this thread

1 commit from jrklaus8/mike-Canada, oldest first. Source extracted verbatim from the harvested git log.

SHA Subject Author Date
4fecd8ff Implement Phase 2 features: Sovereignty Auth, MCP, Redline Parser, and Multi-Model Council MikeOSS Bot 2026-05-22 ↗ GitHub

Capture this thread into my fork

Download a single Markdown prompt that tells Claude how to port every commit above into your working tree — adapting paths and structure to match your repo. Run it via claude -p < capture-thread-542.md from inside the repo you want the changes in.

⬇ Download capture-thread-542.md