legalrealist stamps Mike 'hardened' - then admits nothing's actually fixed
A fork that brands itself security-hardened concedes, one commit later, that not a single fix has been applied.
legalrealist has relabelled its copy of Mike as a security-hardened build and published a structured audit of the shared codebase - 113 findings across nine areas. The headline risks are serious: documents from opposing counsel can be fed into the AI in a way that hijacks its instructions while it still has full access to its tools, and the core version-history feature has no safeguards against two people editing at once, which can quietly corrupt records.
The twist is in the framing. The first commit hinted the work was underway; the second walks it back to plain English - the fixes haven't been written yet, and the page will be updated as they are. So the value here isn't hardened code. It's the audit itself, which maps weaknesses in the common base that many Mike forks are built on.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?