Review Tables: rename from Tabular Review and add Matter Document Review template
zgbrenner renames the upstream "Tabular Review" feature to "Review Tables" across all user-facing surfaces, then adds a built-in eight-column template tuned for U.S. legal intake. The plumbing is unchanged; the substance is in the column prompts.
The rename is surface-only: sidebar labels, project tabs, modal breadcrumbs, page titles, and empty states all switch to "Review Table/Tables," while internal type names and URL routes stay as-is. That decision keeps the diff small and avoids any routing or data-model risk.
The substantive addition is the Matter Document Review template. It defines eight default columns: Document Name, Document Type, Date, People/Parties, Short Summary, Key Issues, Suggested Saved Legal Task, and Needs Attorney Review. The column prompts are notably conservative. Each one instructs the model to use only content from the uploaded document, write "Unknown" when a value cannot be determined, avoid inventing parties or dates, and never make a definitive privilege call. The Needs Attorney Review column defaults to Yes whenever the document touches rights, deadlines, filings, settlement, or sensitive data.
Every Review Table now carries a persistent amber banner stating the table is a draft for attorney review, and cells are editable so lawyers can correct extractions in place. Launching the create modal from inside a matter pre-selects the new template, pins it at the top of the template dropdown, and pre-checks the matter's documents.
The Suggested Saved Legal Task column maps to Gary's eight built-in tasks, but at this point it is informational only. The column shows a label; clicking it does nothing yet. zgbrenner's own docs note the follow-up: wire the tag to actually launch the matching task.
The test file matterReviewTable.test.ts has nine tests covering workflow registration, column order, the tag sets, the conservative defaults, and the absence of legacy "Tabular Review" wording. The next commit in this series closes the actionable-column gap.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?