zgbrenner turns document review tables into a launchpad for action
A fork of Mike reworks bulk document review so a reviewer can triage a matter's files and kick off the right follow-up task without leaving the row.
zgbrenner renamed the upstream bulk-review feature to the plainer "Review Table" and shipped a ready-made Matter Document Review template: eight columns built for U.S. legal work, including document type, dates, parties, a short summary, key issues, and a flag for whether a human attorney needs to look. The instructions behind those columns are deliberately conservative - they pull only from the uploaded document, never guess, mark anything missing as "Unknown," and err toward flagging for attorney review whenever privilege, deadlines, filings, settlement, or sensitive data are in play.
The second piece closes the loop: each row can suggest a saved legal task, and a reviewer can launch that task straight from the table. So triage and the next action live in one place instead of two. The work is well-tested rather than a quick sketch.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?