hoogvliets makes the data layer reviewable on its own terms
A downstream fork's database work gets carved out into a standalone slice so AGPL reviewers can actually inspect it.
As part of a broader open-source license disclosure, hoogvliets has split the database half of the work into its own pull request - migrations, schema, and local-development plumbing in one place, separate from the runtime and frontend pieces. The headline change is moving off a single big schema file onto a managed migration tool, so the database can evolve forward and roll back one step at a time instead of being recreated wholesale.
The schema itself isn't just plumbing. It adds row-level security to keep tenants from seeing each other's data, an encrypted store for API keys, soft-delete on user profiles, and scaffolding for an account deletion job - the kind of lifecycle and isolation controls a buyer's security review will ask about. There's also PDF conversion status tracking and workflow-sharing checks woven in.
The stated point is transparency to the upstream community rather than shipping new behaviour.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?