Gadoes makes citations prove themselves
The dispumike fork adds a one-click way to re-check whether a cited source actually says what the AI claimed it said.
Every citation the assistant produces now gets a stable identity and a verification state - pending, verified, unverified, or unavailable - shown as a small badge on the citation card. When a user hits "Verify & read," the backend goes back to the original source, re-runs the same lookup that produced the citation, and compares. The answer comes back as a status the reader can actually trust at a glance.
This is the move that separates grounded legal AI from a chatbot that footnotes confidently and hopes nobody checks. It's also the piece most teams skip, because it's quieter to build than a new chat feature and harder to demo. Gadoes shipped it anyway. One honest caveat from the fork's own notes: every verification call hits the underlying source again, so cost and rate limits matter - caching is effectively required alongside it.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?