adamwolfe2 turns Mike into AM Collective's in-house deal reader

A new internal user guide reframes the open-source legal AI as a structured first-read tool for credit and shareholder agreements.

contract-reviewsummarization

The fork adds a branded guide pointing AM Collective's lawyers at their hosted deployment and walking them through three jobs: ad-hoc contract review, a 21-point Credit Agreement Summary covering parties, facilities, interest, repayment, covenants, security, events of default, change-of-control, prepayment and governing law, and a 15-point Shareholder Agreement Summary. The framing is unambiguous - this is pitched at a private-equity, credit and portfolio-company audience, not generic legal users.

The most quotable line is the claim that the Credit Agreement workflow replaces a junior associate's "$400-800 first read." Whether or not you buy the number, it's a clear signal of which workflows AM Collective considers production-ready, and which structured outputs they're willing to put in front of deal teams. The guide itself is too branded to lift, but its shape is a useful template for anyone documenting a similar internal rollout.

So what Worth a look for in-house teams or legal-ops leads thinking about how to scope and package an AI first-read for transactional work.

View this fork on GitHub →

Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?

Commits in this thread

1 commit from adamwolfe2/mike-amcollective, oldest first. Source extracted verbatim from the harvested git log.

SHA Subject Author Date
9033f23f docs: add usage guide covering workflows, use cases, and tips adamwolfe2 2026-04-30 ↗ GitHub

Capture this thread into my fork

Download a single Markdown prompt that tells Claude how to port every commit above into your working tree — adapting paths and structure to match your repo. Run it via claude -p < capture-thread-92.md from inside the repo you want the changes in.

⬇ Download capture-thread-92.md