BradyOnTech quietly strips the license off Mike
The fork's only commit deletes the AGPL license file and blanks the license field in the project metadata, with no code changes attached.
Mike ships under AGPL-3.0, a copyleft license that lets anyone use and modify the code but requires downstream forks to keep the same terms and share their changes. BradyOnTech's fork is a single commit that removes the license file entirely, drops the license section from the README, and empties the license field in the project's package metadata. The commit message is just "new main."
A downstream fork can't unilaterally relicense AGPL code, so the metadata is misleading rather than legally effective. But the intent it signals is the interesting part: someone appears to be preparing to present Mike as if it were unencumbered. Any code changes that show up in this fork later are still bound by AGPL, regardless of what the repo claims about itself.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?