Davemaina1 puts Mike on a Kenyan-law honesty contract
The fork rewires the assistant to refuse rather than guess when it's asked about Kenyan statutes or cases.
Davemaina1's fork replaces the standard "answer from your legal knowledge" instruction with an eight-rule contract: before citing any Kenyan statute, case, regulation or guidance, the assistant has to actually look it up. Two retrieval tools sit behind it - one searches a local corpus of Kenyan legal material, the other does a web search restricted to a short allowlist of trusted Kenyan and East African legal sites like kenyalaw.org and the judiciary's own portal. Inventing or paraphrasing citations is banned outright, empty results have to be admitted, and pre-1977 East African Court of Appeal cases get flagged as persuasive rather than binding.
The contract was deliberately wired in ahead of the retrieval plumbing, so a misconfigured deployment fails closed: the model refuses instead of hallucinating. Results also carry enough metadata - court, year, binding status - for the assistant to prefer newer authority and flag conflicts between the corpus and the web.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?