open-legal-products gives Mike an audit trail
Mike now records a history of user and product actions, making it easier to trace how work moved through the system.
For legal teams, that kind of record can matter when a decision, document change, or access event needs explaining later. It gives the product a stronger basis for internal oversight and review.
The practical details still deserve scrutiny before adoption: retaining this information creates privacy and data-management obligations, and bringing the capability into an existing deployment may require careful migration planning.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?