amal66 makes Mike's audit trail less likely to spill client data
This fork replaces ad hoc chat logging with structured records that make individual requests easier to trace.
amal66 has added a more disciplined way to record what happens during a request, including a unique identifier that follows it through the system. That gives an operations team a cleaner trail when investigating an error or unusual result.
Just as important, the change removes console-style output from the chat workflow where personal or case information could be exposed too casually. It is a useful observability upgrade, but not a complete privacy guarantee: existing logging still needs checking against the organisation's redaction rules and the systems that read those logs.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?