amal66 turns hardening follow-ups into a sturdier Mike
This fork converts a backlog of reliability concerns into tested safeguards across the product's most failure-prone edges.
amal66 has taken a broad pass at making Mike less brittle when outside services, uploads, and AI providers do not behave as expected. It is a stabilisation effort rather than a new legal workflow, but one with direct consequences for teams relying on the system in production.
- Safer handling of web requests and errors, so failures are less likely to cascade.
- Circuit protections for AI providers, helping the product respond more predictably when a provider is unavailable.
- Stronger storage and upload checks, reducing avoidable problems around submitted material.
- Configurable AI service connections, giving deployments more flexibility in where models are accessed.
- Optional checks against a live Supabase database service, for teams that want to validate that integration.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?