terpstra-209 gives web-chat edits a real author
Document histories now better reflect who actually proposed a change.
Anyone reviewing a document through the web chat will now have proposed revisions labelled with the person who made them, using their profile name or email address. Previously, every revision appeared to come from Mike, even when several people were involved.
It is a small change with a substantial audit-trail payoff. Lawyers and legal-ops staff can distinguish their own changes from colleagues' without guessing from the document history. Where a user profile lacks usable details, the system still falls back to Mike, so some records may remain imprecise.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?