open-legal-products makes Mike's Word edits feel like the web app

The same tracked-change workflow now carries a more consistent visual language whether lawyers work in a browser or inside Word.

workflowintegration

Mike now shares its pill-shaped action controls across the main product and its Word add-in, reducing the sense that document work is a separate, lesser workflow.

  • Word edit cards now follow the web app's action styling and order.
  • A single suggested change appears on its own, rather than inside an unnecessary group.
  • Guidance behind those suggestions now pushes for precise edits, grouping only changes that are genuinely nearby.

The result is a cleaner review experience that should make proposed edits easier to scan and act on in the document where legal work often happens.

So what Legal teams moving between browser-based review and Word should care because consistent actions and clearer change cards reduce friction at the point of approval.

View this fork on GitHub →

Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?

Commits in this thread

2 commits from open-legal-products/mike, oldest first. Source extracted verbatim from the harvested git log.

SHA Subject Author Date
5db7e8f4 refactor: align Word tracked-change edit cards willchen96 2026-08-18 ↗ GitHub
db3abddb fix(word-addin): resolve shared pill dependencies willchen96 2026-08-18 ↗ GitHub

Capture this thread into my fork

Download a single Markdown prompt that tells Claude how to port every commit above into your working tree — adapting paths and structure to match your repo. Run it via claude -p < capture-thread-1286.md from inside the repo you want the changes in.

⬇ Download capture-thread-1286.md