amal66 makes Mike's accessibility checks pull their weight
This fork turns accessibility from a late-stage concern into a routine quality check, while fixing barriers it already found.
amal66 has expanded browser testing to look for accessibility problems across sign-in, the assistant, project lists and tabular review.
- Automated checks now catch page-blocking barriers for screen-reader users.
- The first scans prompted clearer labels for the assistant send control and bulk-selection boxes, so those controls are usable now.
- Nightly checks, retry attempts and downloadable failure reports make problems easier to spot and investigate.
The team has started by blocking only the most severe issues, while keeping less severe findings visible until they are ready to raise the bar.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?