amal66 puts Mike's frontend quality gate back to work
A broken test check had made every new contribution look suspect, even when the tests themselves passed.
amal66 repaired the guardrail by expanding real-world test coverage across the parts of Mike's interface recently changed: finding and paging through reviews, uploading documents, using tabular review and chat features, and filtering workflows.
The important choice was not to make the check easier to pass. The team set the required coverage level just below the newly measured result, so small changes retain room to move while a large untested feature should be caught before it lands. Testing also surfaced several follow-up risks around uploads, pagination and bulk operations, which were documented rather than quietly folded into this focused change.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?