duncanmcqueen is giving legal PDFs their structure back
A proposed overhaul would make extracted legal text more faithful before it reaches chat, quotes, and document workflows.
PDFs often look orderly to a reader but arrive as a jumble of tiny text fragments. Duncanmcqueen's proposed approach rebuilds the page from its layout, rather than treating every fragment as ordinary prose.
- Reconstructs lines and wrapped clauses in their intended reading order.
- Avoids false spaces inside words split by PDF typography.
- Retains paragraph breaks, indentation, and limited column spacing for items such as signature blocks and simple tables.
- Keeps page order and existing fallbacks for PDFs whose text cannot be read.
That matters because the same extracted text feeds document chat and citation matching: better source text should mean answers and quoted passages that track the original document more closely.
So what Legal teams using PDF-heavy matter files should care because small layout errors can turn into misleading context or unreliable citations.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?