Digitally-Challenged turns Mike into a Social Security disability review desk
The fork adds structured, practice-specific review workflows for disability decisions, with personal-injury work signalled as the next lane.
The new review templates guide a lawyer through an administrative or judge's disability decision in a consistent table, pulling out the findings that matter for an appeal or court challenge. They cover the sequential disability analysis, work-capacity findings, how medical opinions were handled, and relevant filing-deadline calculations.
Alongside the legal content, Digitally-Challenged has tightened the checks that build these templates. Each column now needs a recognised format, and tag fields must be configured properly. That is unglamorous work, but it makes a growing library of review workflows less likely to produce inconsistent output.
The underlying editable workflow material sits outside this fork, so GitHub shows the generated result rather than the source prompts.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?