foolish-bandit pitches an Explain This workflow for Gary
A closed PR floated a structured 'break this down for me' surface, a named assistant persona, and friendlier failure messages - none of it landed.
The proposal added a dedicated page where a user pastes a chunk of legal text, sets context, goal, and tone, and lets the app build a structured prompt before handing off to chat. The same PR promoted that flow to a front-and-centre action card on the assistant landing screen, treated upload errors as something the UI actually shows you, and renamed the sidebar from a generic "Assistant" to "Ask Gary" - a small but deliberate step toward giving the product a face.
The rest of the bundle tidied edges: a single shared message when the backend is unreachable across the draft, review, and explain flows, a visible banner whenever someone is running with the local auth bypass turned on, and a swap from Google-hosted fonts to a self-hosted Inter. Gary's maintainers closed the PR without merging, so all of it stays a sketch.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?