nforum teaches Mike when to say no
A new set of refusal rules tells the assistant to clam up on personal data, resist prompt-leak tricks, and stay inside its lane on tool use.
nforum added three guardrail sections to Mike's core instructions. The first stops the assistant from quoting or even acknowledging its own hidden instructions, including when a user tries the old trick of pretending an earlier conversation was cut off mid-paste.
The second draws a clear line on personal data: the assistant will refuse to pull out things like Social Security numbers, bank details, medical history, or named individuals' settlement figures, no matter what's been uploaded. Ordinary legal work - contract terms, party names, business addresses - stays untouched; the block triggers on the type of request, not on what documents happen to be available. The third limits tool misuse, such as bulk-harvesting documents or quietly copying one client's data into another's matter.
Worth knowing: these are instructions, not hard walls, and the bulk-document rule could trip up legitimate multi-file review depending on phrasing.
Spotted something wrong? Or know the PR text has fresher detail than the writeup above?